US attacks on Iranian oil vessels called act of desperation

A US military analyst has described Washington's recent attacks on Iranian oil vessels as an act of desperation, reflecting a deepening sense of military and political helplessness. The analyst, identified as Mottern, pointed to several factors indicating US vulnerability, including shortages of weapons, fatigued air crews, and rising economic pressure on American citizens at home.

Mottern also accused the US administration of overstating threats in the Strait of Hormuz, drawing parallels to past incidents that were used to justify military escalation. He noted that the US Navy is deliberately avoiding close-range engagement with Iranian forces due to Iran's advanced anti-ship capabilities.

The remarks come amid heightened tensions in the Persian Gulf and the Sea of Oman, where the US has increased its military presence and conducted strikes against Iranian oil tankers. These actions have raised concerns about potential disruptions to global oil supplies and further instability in the region.

According to Mehr News Agency (MNA), the analyst's comments highlight a growing perception among some US military experts that the current approach is not only ineffective but also counterproductive, potentially strengthening Iran's position rather than weakening it. The report also underscores the broader context of US-Iran tensions, including threats against Iran's nuclear facilities and ongoing disputes over maritime security.

As the situation evolves, international observers are closely monitoring the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for global energy shipments. The analyst's assessment suggests that the US may be facing significant challenges in sustaining its military operations in the region, both in terms of resources and strategic coherence.